Rosploch v. Hunt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosploch v. Hunt

12 A.D.2d 965, 214 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12782

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 965 (Rosploch v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosploch v. Hunt, 12 A.D.2d 965, 214 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, allegedly sustained when the automobile operated by defendant Hunt, Jr., and owned by defendant Hunt, Sr., struck the rear of the automobile [966]*966in which the plaintiffs were riding, defendant Hunt, Jr., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 7, 1960, which grants the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Order reversed as to said defendant Hunt, Jr. (the only defendant who appealed), with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied as to him. The record presents issues of fact which should be resolved after trial. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, allegedly sustained when the automobile operated by defendant Hunt, Jr., and owned by defendant Hunt, Sr., struck the rear of the automobile [966]*966in which the plaintiffs were riding, defendant Hunt, Jr., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 7, 1960, which grants the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Order reversed as to said defendant Hunt, Jr. (the only defendant who appealed), with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied as to him. The record presents issues of fact which should be resolved after trial. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 965, 214 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosploch-v-hunt-nyappdiv-1961.