Rospigliosi v. New Orleans, M. & O. R.

237 F. 341, 150 C.C.A. 355, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1963
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 31, 1916·No. No. 2936·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing an intervention attacking the sale of a railroad under foreclosure proceedings, and also from a decree of confirmation of the sale. Judge Toulmin, in dismissing the intervention and confirming the sale, gave elaborate and satisfactory reasons, in which we concur.

The decrees appealed from are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rospigliosi v. New Orleans, M. & O. R., 237 F. 341, 150 C.C.A. 355, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1963 (5th Cir. 1916).

237 F. 341 (Rospigliosi v. New Orleans, M. & O. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Webster v. Barnes Banking Co.
113 F.2d 1003 (Tenth Circuit, 1940)
Bovay v. Townsend
78 F.2d 343 (Eighth Circuit, 1935)
Moore v. Tumwater Paper Mills Co.
42 P.2d 29 (Washington Supreme Court, 1935)
Lee v. Galena-Signal Oil Co. of Pennsylvania
8 S.W.2d 1051 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Palmer v. Bankers' Trust Co.
12 F.2d 747 (Eighth Circuit, 1926)