Rospigliosi v. New Orleans, M. & O. R.
237 F. 341, 150 C.C.A. 355, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1963
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 31, 1916
DocketNo. 2936
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases
This text of 237 F. 341 (Rospigliosi v. New Orleans, M. & O. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rospigliosi v. New Orleans, M. & O. R., 237 F. 341, 150 C.C.A. 355, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1963 (5th Cir. 1916).
Opinion
This is an appeal from a decree dismissing an intervention attacking the sale of a railroad under foreclosure proceedings, and also from a decree of confirmation of the sale. Judge Toulmin, in dismissing the intervention and confirming the sale, gave elaborate and satisfactory reasons, in which we concur.
The decrees appealed from are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Webster v. Barnes Banking Co.
113 F.2d 1003 (Tenth Circuit, 1940)
Bovay v. Townsend
78 F.2d 343 (Eighth Circuit, 1935)
Moore v. Tumwater Paper Mills Co.
42 P.2d 29 (Washington Supreme Court, 1935)
Lee v. Galena-Signal Oil Co. of Pennsylvania
8 S.W.2d 1051 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Palmer v. Bankers' Trust Co.
12 F.2d 747 (Eighth Circuit, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
237 F. 341, 150 C.C.A. 355, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rospigliosi-v-new-orleans-m-o-r-ca5-1916.