Rospen, Inc. v. Leno

501 A.2d 938, 101 N.J. 271, 1985 N.J. LEXIS 2668
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 21, 1985
StatusPublished

This text of 501 A.2d 938 (Rospen, Inc. v. Leno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rospen, Inc. v. Leno, 501 A.2d 938, 101 N.J. 271, 1985 N.J. LEXIS 2668 (N.J. 1985).

Opinion

This matter having been duly presented to the Court on an appeal as of right pursuant to Rule 2:2-l(a)(2), there having been a partial dissent in the Appellate Division, and the Court having reviewed the record and having considered the briefs and arguments of counsel on the issues presented in that appeal, and good cause appearing;

[272]*272It is ORDERED that the judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed solely as to the money judgment against defendant, and the matter is remanded to the Superior Court, Law Division, Morris County for a reconsideration of the evidence and, if necessary, the taking of additional evidence, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brody in the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
501 A.2d 938, 101 N.J. 271, 1985 N.J. LEXIS 2668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rospen-inc-v-leno-nj-1985.