Rosner v. East Nassau Medical Group
This text of 119 A.D.2d 563 (Rosner v. East Nassau Medical Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), dated September 7, 1984, which, in effect, denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on the plaintiffs’ failure to supply a bill of particulars as required by a conditional order of preclusion, provided that (1) the plaintiffs serve their bill of particulars within 20 days after service upon them of a copy of the order, and (2) the plaintiffs’ attorney pay $500 to the defendants’ attorney within that time period.
Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
On oral argument, the defendants conceded that they had accepted the bill of particulars sent to them in compliance with the order of Special Term. The plaintiffs’ attorney also complied with the second condition imposed by Special Term, i.e., he sent a $500 check to the defendants’ attorney. Although this check was sent back by the defendants’ attorney, the rejection letter accompanying the check indicated that it was not the "policy” of the defendants’ attorney "to accept Court imposed costs from another attorney”. Under these particular circumstances, the defendants’ right to appeal was waived. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 A.D.2d 563, 500 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosner-v-east-nassau-medical-group-nyappdiv-1986.