Rosman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

41 A.D.2d 610, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5179

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.2d 610 (Rosman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 41 A.D.2d 610, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5179 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

- Motion, insofar as it seeks reargunient, denied Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, granted and the following question certified "Was the order of this Court, whiih reversed the order of the Supi~e~iie Court, :~ made? " Concur- Nünez, Kupfermair and Capozzoli~ ~~McGivein,. J. .P~., thasents m the following memorandum I disagree with m~ brethren concermi~g their g~antmg of leave to go to the Court of Appeals 1 there was no dissenting opinion 2 The very basis of our decision was that tri~hle issues remained, including "a determination of the precise meaning of the original official French text of Article 17 of the Warsaw Coiivention" Thus, with unanimity, we, in effect, determined that the record was mcomplete and nonfinal, and unready for reviev (Cf. CPLR 56O2; Cohen and Karge~, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [1952~, § 39) Grantn~ leave involves an inherent

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

- Motion, insofar as it seeks reargunient, denied Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, granted and the following question certified "Was the order of this Court, whiih reversed the order of the Supi~e~iie Court, :~ made? " Concur- Nünez, Kupfermair and Capozzoli~ ~~McGivein,. J. .P~., thasents m the following memorandum I disagree with m~ brethren concermi~g their g~antmg of leave to go to the Court of Appeals 1 there was no dissenting opinion 2 The very basis of our decision was that tri~hle issues remained, including "a determination of the precise meaning of the original official French text of Article 17 of the Warsaw Coiivention" Thus, with unanimity, we, in effect, determined that the record was mcomplete and nonfinal, and unready for reviev (Cf. CPLR 56O2; Cohen and Karge~, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [1952~, § 39) Grantn~ leave involves an inherent

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.2d 610, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosman-v-trans-world-airlines-inc-nyappdiv-1973.