Rosman v. Dupre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosman v. Dupre

12 A.D.2d 912, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12597

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 912 (Rosman v. Dupre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosman v. Dupre, 12 A.D.2d 912, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12597 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment entered upon a resettled order granting summary judgment in the amount of $6,03-2.80, with interest, costs and disbursements, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reducing the amount of said judgment to $2,441.60, with interest, costs and disbursements, and otherwise affirmed, with costs to plaintiff-respondent. The agreement for the compensation of plaintiff by its very terms provides that his fee was to be paid one third upon receipt of the revenue agents’ reports, and the balance in monthly installments of $250 each. Only four of these installments were due when this suit was instituted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment entered upon a resettled order granting summary judgment in the amount of $6,03-2.80, with interest, costs and disbursements, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reducing the amount of said judgment to $2,441.60, with interest, costs and disbursements, and otherwise affirmed, with costs to plaintiff-respondent. The agreement for the compensation of plaintiff by its very terms provides that his fee was to be paid one third upon receipt of the revenue agents’ reports, and the balance in monthly installments of $250 each. Only four of these installments were due when this suit was instituted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 912, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosman-v-dupre-nyappdiv-1961.