Rosman v. Clark
This text of 27 A.D.2d 839 (Rosman v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—• Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 9, 1966, reversed and motion granted, with $10 costs and disbursements. The method of service of process chosen by plaintiff is not authorized and is therefore invalid (CPLR 313, 311; Business Corporation Law, §§ 307, 306). It further appears that the facts, so far as they appear in this record, would not be sufficient basis for juris[840]*840diction (Kramer v. Vogl, 17 N Y 2d 27; Feathers v. McLucas, 15 N Y 2d 443, 458, 464). TJghetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Mnnder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.2d 839, 278 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosman-v-clark-nyappdiv-1967.