Roslyn Union Free School District v. Barkan
This text of 85 A.D.3d 1148 (Roslyn Union Free School District v. Barkan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty and negligence, the defendants William Costigan, Ronna Niederman, Eatricia Schissel, and Ellen Siegel appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, Jr., J.), dated July 15, 2010, which denied their motion to disqualify the plaintiffs counsel.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellants’ motion to disqualify the plaintiff’s counsel (see Tekni-Plex, Inc. v Meyner & Landis, 89 NY2d 123, 131 [1996]; Solow v Grace & Co., 83 NY2d 303, 308 [1994]; Talvy v American Red Cross in Greater N.Y., 205 AD2d 143, 148-149 [1994], affd 87 NY2d 826 [1995]). Rivera, J.P., Florio, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 A.D.3d 1148, 925 N.Y.S.2d 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roslyn-union-free-school-district-v-barkan-nyappdiv-2011.