Rosko Steele, Inc. v. United States
55 Cust. Ct. 375, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1827
United States Customs Court·Decided June 21, 1965·No. No. 69391; protest 64/12590 (Seattle)·Published
Opinion
[376]*376Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of novelty figures, not chiefly used for the amusement of children, which have as an essential feature an electrical element or device, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rosko Steele, Inc. v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 375, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1827 (cusc 1965).
55 Cust. Ct. 375 (Rosko Steele, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.