Rosito Asuncion, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Edilberto Asuncion v. Allstate Insurance Company, an Illinois Company

Ninth Circuit

Rosito Asuncion, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Edilberto Asuncion v. Allstate Insurance Company, an Illinois Company

975 F.2d 663, 92 Daily Journal DAR 13109, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7987, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22231, 1992 WL 235235

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 17, 1992

Docket91-16247

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 975 F.2d 663 (Rosito Asuncion, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Edilberto Asuncion v. Allstate Insurance Company, an Illinois Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosito Asuncion, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Edilberto Asuncion v. Allstate Insurance Company, an Illinois Company, 975 F.2d 663, 92 Daily Journal DAR 13109, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7987, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22231, 1992 WL 235235 (9th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Rosito Asuncion, special administrator of the estate of Edilberto Asuncion, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance Company. We review de novo both a district court’s interpretation of state law and a grant of summary judgment. Nevada Power Co. v. Monsanto Co., 955 F.2d 1304, 1306 (9th Cir.1992). For the reasons given by the district court, 1 see Asuncion v. Allstate Ins. Co., 776 F.Supp. 1432 (D.Haw.1991), the judgment is

AFFIRMED.

1

. Although the district court cited Icban v. State Farm, MVI-89-61 (September 28, 1990), aff’d, Circuit Court CV No. 90-3400-10 (May 14, 1991), as awaiting decision by the Hawaii Supreme Court, we have determined that no appeal to the state supreme court was pursued in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosito Asuncion, special administrator of the estate of Edilberto Asuncion, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance Company. We review de novo both a district court’s interpretation of state law and a grant of summary judgment. Nevada Power Co. v. Monsanto Co., 955 F.2d 1304, 1306 (9th Cir.1992). For the reasons given by the district court, 1 see Asuncion v. Allstate Ins. Co., 776 F.Supp. 1432 (D.Haw.1991), the judgment is

AFFIRMED.

1

. Although the district court cited Icban v. State Farm, MVI-89-61 (September 28, 1990), aff’d, Circuit Court CV No. 90-3400-10 (May 14, 1991), as awaiting decision by the Hawaii Supreme Court, we have determined that no appeal to the state supreme court was pursued in that case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

975 F.2d 663, 92 Daily Journal DAR 13109, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7987, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22231, 1992 WL 235235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosito-asuncion-as-special-administrator-of-the-estate-of-edilberto-ca9-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack