Rosipal v. Ward

538 A.2d 495, 517 Pa. 460, 1988 Pa. LEXIS 71
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 21, 1988·No. Appeal No. 84 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1987·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

LARSEN and STOUT, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosipal v. Ward, 538 A.2d 495, 517 Pa. 460, 1988 Pa. LEXIS 71 (Pa. 1988).

538 A.2d 495 (Rosipal v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Santiago v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance
613 A.2d 1235 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Alston v. St. Paul Insurance Companies
612 A.2d 421 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Shaffer v. Procter & Gamble
604 A.2d 289 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Danese v. Morrison-Knudsen/Slattery
784 F. Supp. 228 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1992)
Alston v. St. Paul Ins. Companies
567 A.2d 663 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Kuney v. PMA Insurance
550 A.2d 1009 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)
Alston v. St. Paul Insurance
48 Pa. D. & C.3d 237 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1988)