Rosinoff v. Altshul
123 A. 376, 99 N.J.L. 519, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 180
This text of 123 A. 376 (Rosinoff v. Altshul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rosinoff v. Altshul, 123 A. 376, 99 N.J.L. 519, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 180 (N.J. 1924).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, Clark, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stegal v. Union Bank & Federal Trust Co.
176 S.E. 438 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
123 A. 376, 99 N.J.L. 519, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosinoff-v-altshul-nj-1924.