Rosinoff v. Altshul

123 A. 376, 99 N.J.L. 519, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 180

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 25, 1924·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, Clark, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosinoff v. Altshul, 123 A. 376, 99 N.J.L. 519, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 180 (N.J. 1924).

Pincite

123 A. 376 (Rosinoff v. Altshul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.