Rosimo v. Office of Personnel Management

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rosimo v. Office of Personnel Management. Read the opinion of the Court — 448 F. App'x 60
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 5, 2011·No. 2011-3090·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit FABIAN M. ROSIMO, Petitioner, V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Responden,t. ` 2011-3090 . Petition for review of the Merit S}/stems Protection Board in case no. SF0831100613-I-1. ON MOTION ORDER The Office of Personne1 Management moves for an 8- §iay extension of time, until August 12, 20l1, to file its response brief Upon consideration thereof IT IS ORDERED TH.ATZ

ROSINK)V.OPLI cc: Fabian M. Rosimo She11ey D. Weger, Esq. U.S.COU THEFE S The motion is granted FoR THE CoURT ms 0 5 mm /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an H0rba1y C1erk 932 §'nF l_%”` Q'uo §§ 2 LS FOR UlT AUG 05 2011 IANHORE~ALY n CLEH(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosimo v. Office of Personnel Management, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Rosimo v. Office of Personnel Management (Rosimo v. Office of Personnel Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.