Rosier v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Rosier v. State

117 S.E. 95, 30 Ga. App. 179, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 332

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 11, 1923

Docket14226

StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.E. 95 (Rosier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosier v. State, 117 S.E. 95, 30 Ga. App. 179, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 332 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.'

(a) The conviction of the defendant not depending entirely upon circumstantial evidence, the court did not err, in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request, in failing to instruct the jury upon the law of circumstantial evidence.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI