Rosier v. State
943 So. 2d 1018, 2006 WL 3733318
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 2006·No. 2D05-2899·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Reashad ROSIER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn M. Giambalvo, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed without prejudice to Reashad Rosier's right, if any, to file a timely and sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
WHATLEY, NORTHCUTT, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rosier v. State, 943 So. 2d 1018, 2006 WL 3733318 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
943 So. 2d 1018 (Rosier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rosier v. State
144 So. 3d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Manning v. Tunnell
943 So. 2d 1018 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)