Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rosier v. State

Rosier v. State

943 So. 2d 1018, 2006 WL 3733318
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 15, 2006
Docket2D05-2899
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 943 So. 2d 1018 (Rosier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosier v. State, 943 So. 2d 1018, 2006 WL 3733318 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

943 So.2d 1018 (2006)

Reashad ROSIER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D05-2899.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 15, 2006.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn M. Giambalvo, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to Reashad Rosier's right, if any, to file a timely and sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

WHATLEY, NORTHCUTT, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosier v. State
144 So. 3d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Manning v. Tunnell
943 So. 2d 1018 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
943 So. 2d 1018, 2006 WL 3733318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosier-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.