Rosie v. Willard

6 N.W. 872, 44 Mich. 382, 1880 Mich. LEXIS 572
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 13, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 N.W. 872 (Rosie v. Willard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosie v. Willard, 6 N.W. 872, 44 Mich. 382, 1880 Mich. LEXIS 572 (Mich. 1880).

Opinion

Marston, C. J.

The errors alleged in this case are upon the refusal of the court to take the case from the jury, because there was no evidence of a taking or conversion of the logs, and second, that there was no proof of copartnership of defendants.

[383]*383We are of opinion that there was evidence tending to establish both propositions, and that within the ruling of Conely v. McDonald 40 Mich. 152 the court properly submitted the case to the jury.

A discussion of the evidence would be of no general importance and will not therefore be attempted.

The judgment must be affirmed.with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vultee v. Saginaw-Bay City Railway Co.
152 N.W. 981 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1915)
Krouse v. Detroit United Railway
131 N.W. 548 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.W. 872, 44 Mich. 382, 1880 Mich. LEXIS 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosie-v-willard-mich-1880.