Rosick Hill v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 9, 2016·No. 05-15-00989-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered June 9, 2016

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00989-CR

ROSICK HILL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-1171579-K

ORDER The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On May 9, 2016, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s

brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the

appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court-appointed counsel Nanette

Hendrickson; (3) counsel’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is due to her

workload; and (4) counsel anticipates filing a brief within thirty days.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosick Hill v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Rosick Hill v. State (Rosick Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.