Rosick Hill v. State
This text of Rosick Hill v. State (Rosick Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered June 9, 2016
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00989-CR
ROSICK HILL, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-1171579-K
ORDER The Court REINSTATES the appeal.
On May 9, 2016, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s
brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the
appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court-appointed counsel Nanette
Hendrickson; (3) counsel’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is due to her
workload; and (4) counsel anticipates filing a brief within thirty days.
We ORDER appellant to file his brief within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rosick Hill v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosick-hill-v-state-texapp-2016.