Roshwalb v. Regency Maritime Corp.

182 A.D.2d 401
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 2, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 182 A.D.2d 401 (Roshwalb v. Regency Maritime Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roshwalb v. Regency Maritime Corp., 182 A.D.2d 401 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (David H. Edwards, Jr., J.), entered March 26, 1991, upon a jury verdict, which, inter alia, awarded plaintiff Marilyn Roshwalb $750,000 for pain and suffering and apportioned liability 90% against defendant Regency Maritime Corp. and 10% against plaintiff Marilyn Roshwalb, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The jury’s finding of negligence is adequately supported by the evidence that plaintiffs were the first passengers to occupy the subject cabin since its renovation, that the bathtub therein was not equipped with anti-slip strips at the time of the accident, that all cabin bathtubs in defendant’s vessel were supposed to have been so equipped, and that defendant’s cleaning staff failed to remedy this unsafe condition. A vessel owner or carrier is in no different position than a landowner with respect to the duty owed to licensees and invitees to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances (Kermarec v Compagnie Generate, 358 US 625; Plagíanos v American Airlines, 912 F2d 57). We also find that the court’s charge read as a whole, adequately conveyed the applicable law.

Finally, the jury’s award to plaintiff, 63 years old at the time of the accident, of $750,000 for past and future pain and suffering associated with the comminuted fracture of her right elbow does not constitute a material deviation from what would be reasonable compensation (CPLR 5501 [c]). Concur— Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winderman v. Brooklyn/McDonald Avenue Shoprite Associates, Inc.
85 A.D.3d 1018 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Park v. City of New York
70 A.D.3d 406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Szpakowski v. Shelby Realty, LLC
9 Misc. 3d 885 (New York Supreme Court, 2005)
Hotaling v. Corning Inc.
12 A.D.3d 1064 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Chisholm v. Madison Square Garden Center, Inc.
289 A.D.2d 168 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Douglass v. St. Joseph's Hospital
246 A.D.2d 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Geressy v. Digital Equipment Corp.
980 F. Supp. 640 (E.D. New York, 1997)
Guillory v. Nautilus Real Estate, Inc.
208 A.D.2d 336 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Simmons v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
207 A.D.2d 290 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Martinez v. Gouverneur Gardens Housing Corp.
184 A.D.2d 264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 A.D.2d 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roshwalb-v-regency-maritime-corp-nyappdiv-1992.