Roshunda Lago v. Harris County, Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 4, 2017
Docket01-17-00103-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Roshunda Lago v. Harris County, Texas (Roshunda Lago v. Harris County, Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roshunda Lago v. Harris County, Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Opinion issued May 4, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00103-CV ——————————— ROSHUNDA LAGO, Appellant V. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1078421

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Roshunda Lago appeals from a judgment signed January 6, 2017. Lago has

neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate

costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207,

51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-

District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158. After being notified that this appeal

was subject to dismissal, Lago did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5

(allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Roshunda Lago v. Harris County, Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roshunda-lago-v-harris-county-texas-texapp-2017.