Roshan Ramkhelawan v. State of Florida
188 So. 3d 880, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 191, 2016 WL 64906
This text of 188 So. 3d 880 (Roshan Ramkhelawan v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roshan Ramkhelawan v. State of Florida, 188 So. 3d 880, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 191, 2016 WL 64906 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
Opinion
We affirm the circuit court’s order denying habeas corpus relief. Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant seeking appellate review of the trial court’s disposition of the Rule 3.850 motion following the evidentiary hearing and entry of a final order. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(k).
Affirmed ivithout 'prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
188 So. 3d 880, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 191, 2016 WL 64906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roshan-ramkhelawan-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.