Rosga v. Rosga

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rosga v. Rosga

829 S.W.2d 58, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 596, 1992 WL 66741

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 1992·No. No. 60014·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from the provision of a dissolution decree dividing the marital property. We affirm. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evi[59]*59dence, no error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth our reasons for affirming the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from the provision of a dissolution decree dividing the marital property. We affirm. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evi[59]*59dence, no error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth our reasons for affirming the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Rosga v. Rosga, 829 S.W.2d 58, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 596, 1992 WL 66741 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

829 S.W.2d 58 (Rosga v. Rosga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.