Rosfel Garza v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 20, 2004
Docket13-03-00557-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Rosfel Garza v. State (Rosfel Garza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosfel Garza v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-03-557-CR


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________


ROSFEL GARZA,                                                              Appellant,


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                      Appellee.

______________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam



         Appellant, ROSFEL GARZA, attempts to appeal a conviction for capital murder. The trial court has certified that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

         On March 3, 2004, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

         On April 7, 2004, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response fails to establish either that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

         The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.


                                                      PER CURIAM


Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 20th day of May, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rosfel Garza v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosfel-garza-v-state-texapp-2004.