Roseville Investment Corp. v. Grudin
168 A. 617, 111 N.J.L. 396, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 368
This text of 168 A. 617 (Roseville Investment Corp. v. Grudin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roseville Investment Corp. v. Grudin, 168 A. 617, 111 N.J.L. 396, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 368 (N.J. 1933).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Smith in the Circuit Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None. *Page 399
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
168 A. 617, 111 N.J.L. 396, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roseville-investment-corp-v-grudin-nj-1933.