Rosevelt v. State

142 S.E. 312, 37 Ga. App. 832, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 651
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 7, 1928
Docket18684
StatusPublished

This text of 142 S.E. 312 (Rosevelt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosevelt v. State, 142 S.E. 312, 37 Ga. App. 832, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 651 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the single ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial shows no cause for another hearing of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. M. B. Peacock, Bennet & Peacock, for plaintiff in error. B. G. Gardner, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 S.E. 312, 37 Ga. App. 832, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosevelt-v-state-gactapp-1928.