Rosevelt v. Giles

7 Hill & Den. 166
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1844
StatusPublished

This text of 7 Hill & Den. 166 (Rosevelt v. Giles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosevelt v. Giles, 7 Hill & Den. 166 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

Opinion

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

The statute under which this proceeding was had plainly distinguishes between such orders as may be entered in the common rule book, and such as tnust he obtained on special motion. The rule to appear and plead is “ a rule of coürse(2 R. S. 313, § 4;) but if the party does not appear and plead in proper time, “ the court shall direct his default to be entered.” (§6.) The legislature evidently intended that the court should hear of the matter before the party was forever barred of his claim, The plaintiff should have moved the court [167]*167for the default, showing by affidavit or otherwise when and upon what proof the rule to appear and plead was entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Hill & Den. 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosevelt-v-giles-nysupct-1844.