Rosetty v. Township Committee of Hamilton
232 A.2d 455, 96 N.J. Super. 66, 1967 N.J. Super. LEXIS 471
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Barlow, reported at 82 N. J. Super. 340 (Law Div. 1964).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rosetty v. Township Committee of Hamilton, 232 A.2d 455, 96 N.J. Super. 66, 1967 N.J. Super. LEXIS 471 (N.J. Ct. App. 1967).
232 A.2d 455 (Rosetty v. Township Committee of Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Jerome Shaw, Jr. (081652) (Bergen County & Statewide)
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2020
State v. Shaw
190 A.3d 539 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2018)
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JEROME SHAW, JR. (13-04-0591, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2018
Grubb v. Borough of Hightstown
802 A.2d 596 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2002)
Cabarle v. Governing Body of Tp. of Pemberton
400 A.2d 548 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
In Re Petition to Compel Testimony of Tuso
357 A.2d 1 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
State v. Price
260 A.2d 877 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
Manobianco v. City of Hoboken
232 A.2d 856 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Frank v. Briel
232 A.2d 455 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)