Roseton Hills Sewage-Works Corp. v. Leitman

69 A.D.2d 834, 414 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11507
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 9, 1979·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding, the defendants Baldwin appeal from a final order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated July 11, 1978, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, fixed the compensation for the taking. Final order and judgment, modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto awarding costs in the Supreme Court to the appellants, with costs to the respondent on this appeal. Trial Term erred only in not awarding costs to the appellants, pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 16 of the Condemnation Law, since no offer of compensation was made by respondent to the appellants prior to initiation of the condemnation proceeding. Mollen, P. J., Suozzi, O’Connor and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roseton Hills Sewage-Works Corp. v. Leitman, 69 A.D.2d 834, 414 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11507 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

69 A.D.2d 834 (Roseton Hills Sewage-Works Corp. v. Leitman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the New York Transit Auhority
160 A.D.2d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Village of Port Chester v. Marino
118 A.D.2d 638 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)