Roseton Hills Sewage-Works Corp. v. Leitman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roseton Hills Sewage-Works Corp. v. Leitman

69 A.D.2d 834, 414 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11507

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 9, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 69 A.D.2d 834 (Roseton Hills Sewage-Works Corp. v. Leitman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roseton Hills Sewage-Works Corp. v. Leitman, 69 A.D.2d 834, 414 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11507 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding, the defendants Baldwin appeal from a final order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated July 11, 1978, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, fixed the compensation for the taking. Final order and judgment, modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto awarding costs in the Supreme Court to the appellants, with costs to the respondent on this appeal. Trial Term erred only in not awarding costs to the appellants, pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 16 of the Condemnation Law, since no offer of compensation was made by respondent to the appellants prior to initiation of the condemnation proceeding. Mollen, P. J., Suozzi, O’Connor and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a condemnation proceeding, the defendants Baldwin appeal from a final order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated July 11, 1978, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, fixed the compensation for the taking. Final order and judgment, modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto awarding costs in the Supreme Court to the appellants, with costs to the respondent on this appeal. Trial Term erred only in not awarding costs to the appellants, pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 16 of the Condemnation Law, since no offer of compensation was made by respondent to the appellants prior to initiation of the condemnation proceeding. Mollen, P. J., Suozzi, O’Connor and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 A.D.2d 834, 414 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roseton-hills-sewage-works-corp-v-leitman-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack