Rosenzweig v. Hawkins

27 A.D.2d 723, 276 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4804
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 21, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 A.D.2d 723 (Rosenzweig v. Hawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenzweig v. Hawkins, 27 A.D.2d 723, 276 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Order entered June 25, 1966, herein appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellants, and the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted, with $10 costs. The alleged libelous statements were made during the course of prior litigation concerning the disposition of proceeds of a bank account. It does not appear nor are they shown to be manifestly impertinent to the issues then in litigation or beyond the scope of such issues. As such, an absolute privilege attaches (Seltzer v. Fields, 20 A D 2d 60, affd. 14 N Y 2d 624). Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Rabin and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hanzimanolis v. City of New York
88 Misc. 2d 681 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A.D.2d 723, 276 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenzweig-v-hawkins-nyappdiv-1967.