Rosenzweig v. Hawkins
This text of 27 A.D.2d 723 (Rosenzweig v. Hawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered June 25, 1966, herein appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellants, and the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted, with $10 costs. The alleged libelous statements were made during the course of prior litigation concerning the disposition of proceeds of a bank account. It does not appear nor are they shown to be manifestly impertinent to the issues then in litigation or beyond the scope of such issues. As such, an absolute privilege attaches (Seltzer v. Fields, 20 A D 2d 60, affd. 14 N Y 2d 624). Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Rabin and Bastow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.2d 723, 276 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenzweig-v-hawkins-nyappdiv-1967.