Rosenweig v. Von Bauer
This text of 34 Misc. 767 (Rosenweig v. Von Bauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This .action is brought to recover $400 for work done upon four buildings situated on West One Hundred and Seventeenth street, in the city of New York, and for material furnished in connection with such work, and has been tried twice.
On the first trial the plaintiff recovered a judgment of $200, with costs, which was reversed by the Appellate Term (32 Misc. Rep. 714), on the ground that there was not sufficient proof of the plaintiff’s damages or of the reasonable value of the work actually done by him under the contract. Upon the last trial such proof was furnished and abundantly supports the judgment which was rendered.
As I cannot discover that any error of law was committed upon the trial, I am of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
O’Gorman and Blanchard, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Misc. 767, 68 N.Y.S. 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenweig-v-von-bauer-nyappterm-1901.