Rosenwasser v. Weiss

199 A. 64, 124 N.J. Eq. 14, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 695
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 11, 1938·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

We are in accord with the conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor that the bill of complaint should be dismissed. It suffices to say that appellant, even though a mere surety, is not at liberty to compel the mortgagee to take title to the property and give him credit for the fair value thereof.

The decree is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None. *Page 19

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosenwasser v. Weiss, 199 A. 64, 124 N.J. Eq. 14, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 695 (N.J. 1938).

199 A. 64 (Rosenwasser v. Weiss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fidelity Union Tr. v. Multiple Realty
26 A.2d 155 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
National Newark, C., Co. v. Vangold Realty Co.
5 A.2d 315 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)