Rosenwasser v. Weiss

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Rosenwasser v. Weiss

199 A. 64, 124 N.J. Eq. 14, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 695

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedMay 11, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 199 A. 64 (Rosenwasser v. Weiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenwasser v. Weiss, 199 A. 64, 124 N.J. Eq. 14, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 695 (N.J. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

We are in accord with the conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor that the bill of complaint should be dismissed. It suffices to say that appellant, even though a mere surety, is not at liberty to compel the mortgagee to take title to the property and give him credit for the fair value thereof.

The decree is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None. *Page 19

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We are in accord with the conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor that the bill of complaint should be dismissed. It suffices to say that appellant, even though a mere surety, is not at liberty to compel the mortgagee to take title to the property and give him credit for the fair value thereof.

The decree is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None. *Page 19

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A. 64, 124 N.J. Eq. 14, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenwasser-v-weiss-nj-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack