Rosenthal v. Valdivia

467 So. 2d 836, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1087, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13743
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 1985·No. No. 84-2216·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

- After a non-jury trial, the lower court concluded that the plaintiff-appellant’s prayers for equitable relief were barred by the effect of a prior action between the parties. We find no error either in the finding that the present claims had been [837] released through the settlement of the previous litigation, Silva v. Silva, 467 So.2d 1065, (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); see Bruce Const. Corp. v. Federal Realty Corp., 104 Fla. 93, 139 So. 209 (1932), or the determination that res judicata applied. Hinchee v. Fisher, 93 So.2d 351 (Fla.1957).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosenthal v. Valdivia, 467 So. 2d 836, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1087, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13743 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

467 So. 2d 836 (Rosenthal v. Valdivia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Silva v. Silva
467 So. 2d 1065 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Hinchee v. Fisher
93 So. 2d 351 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Bruce Construction Corp. v. Federal Realty Corp.
139 So. 209 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)