Rosenthal v. Valdivia

467 So. 2d 836, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1087, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13743
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 30, 1985
DocketNo. 84-2216
StatusPublished

This text of 467 So. 2d 836 (Rosenthal v. Valdivia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenthal v. Valdivia, 467 So. 2d 836, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1087, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13743 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

- After a non-jury trial, the lower court concluded that the plaintiff-appellant’s prayers for equitable relief were barred by the effect of a prior action between the parties. We find no error either in the finding that the present claims had been [837]*837released through the settlement of the previous litigation, Silva v. Silva, 467 So.2d 1065, (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); see Bruce Const. Corp. v. Federal Realty Corp., 104 Fla. 93, 139 So. 209 (1932), or the determination that res judicata applied. Hinchee v. Fisher, 93 So.2d 351 (Fla.1957).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Silva v. Silva
467 So. 2d 1065 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Hinchee v. Fisher
93 So. 2d 351 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Bruce Construction Corp. v. Federal Realty Corp.
139 So. 209 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
467 So. 2d 836, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1087, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-valdivia-fladistctapp-1985.