Rosenthal v. Valdivia
This text of 467 So. 2d 836 (Rosenthal v. Valdivia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
- After a non-jury trial, the lower court concluded that the plaintiff-appellant’s prayers for equitable relief were barred by the effect of a prior action between the parties. We find no error either in the finding that the present claims had been [837]*837released through the settlement of the previous litigation, Silva v. Silva, 467 So.2d 1065, (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); see Bruce Const. Corp. v. Federal Realty Corp., 104 Fla. 93, 139 So. 209 (1932), or the determination that res judicata applied. Hinchee v. Fisher, 93 So.2d 351 (Fla.1957).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
467 So. 2d 836, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1087, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-valdivia-fladistctapp-1985.