Rosenthal v. Valdivia
Opinion
- After a non-jury trial, the lower court concluded that the plaintiff-appellant’s prayers for equitable relief were barred by the effect of a prior action between the parties. We find no error either in the finding that the present claims had been [837] released through the settlement of the previous litigation, Silva v. Silva, 467 So.2d 1065, (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); see Bruce Const. Corp. v. Federal Realty Corp., 104 Fla. 93, 139 So. 209 (1932), or the determination that res judicata applied. Hinchee v. Fisher, 93 So.2d 351 (Fla.1957).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
467 So. 2d 836 (Rosenthal v. Valdivia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.