Rosenthal v. Turner

Appellate Court of Illinois

Rosenthal v. Turner

192 Ill. App. 9, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 724

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 11, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,239

StatusPublished

This text of 192 Ill. App. 9 (Rosenthal v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenthal v. Turner, 192 Ill. App. 9, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 724 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Pam

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Witnesses, § 212*—question not within direct examination. Questions on cross-examination which are not within the scope of the direct examination are properly excluded. 4. Appeal and ebbor, § 1235*—when acquiescence bars review. Although under Practice Act, sec. 81 (J. & A. 8618), where a cause is brought up for review upon a stenographic report, it is not necessary to preserve an exception, still the record must show that the ruling complained of was an adverse one, hence cross-errors based upon instructions not to allow interest will not be considered where the attitude of counsel for the complaining party indicated acquiescence therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Pam

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Witnesses, § 212*—question not within direct examination. Questions on cross-examination which are not within the scope of the direct examination are properly excluded. 4. Appeal and ebbor, § 1235*—when acquiescence bars review. Although under Practice Act, sec. 81 (J. & A. 8618), where a cause is brought up for review upon a stenographic report, it is not necessary to preserve an exception, still the record must show that the ruling complained of was an adverse one, hence cross-errors based upon instructions not to allow interest will not be considered where the attitude of counsel for the complaining party indicated acquiescence therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 Ill. App. 9, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-turner-illappct-1915.