Rosenthal v. Rosenthal
265 A.D. 880, 38 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6304
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 23, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 265 A.D. 880 (Rosenthal v. Rosenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rosenthal v. Rosenthal, 265 A.D. 880, 38 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6304 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
Opinion
The aggravation of the. child’s condition since the time of the trial and the undisputed progressive character of the condition, constitute a change in the situation warranting the granting of the allowance. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mitchell v. Mitchell
403 A.2d 1214 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1979)
Grossfield v. Grossfield
19 A.D.2d 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Kraunz v. Kraunz
267 A.D. 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 880, 38 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-rosenthal-nyappdiv-1942.