Rosenthal v. Rosenthal
265 A.D. 880, 38 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6304
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 23, 1942·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The aggravation of the. child’s condition since the time of the trial and the undisputed progressive character of the condition, constitute a change in the situation warranting the granting of the allowance. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rosenthal v. Rosenthal, 265 A.D. 880, 38 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6304 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
265 A.D. 880 (Rosenthal v. Rosenthal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mitchell v. Mitchell
403 A.2d 1214 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1979)
Grossfield v. Grossfield
19 A.D.2d 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Kraunz v. Kraunz
267 A.D. 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)