Rosenthal v. Rosenthal
This text of 464 So. 2d 594 (Rosenthal v. Rosenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The findings and recommendations of the master dated March 24, 1983 were not clearly erroneous, nor does it appear that the master misconceived the legal effect of the evidence. Consequently, it was error for the trial court to fail to approve and adopt those recommendations. Frank v. Frank, 75 So.2d 282 (Fla.1954); Claughton v. Claughton, 347 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Finding all other points raised on the appeal and cross-appeal to be without merit, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court adopt the master’s March 24, 1983 recommendations in their entirety.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
464 So. 2d 594, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 459, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-rosenthal-fladistctapp-1985.