Rosenthal v. Rosenthal

464 So. 2d 594, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 459, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12497
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 19, 1985
DocketNo. 83-2767
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 464 So. 2d 594 (Rosenthal v. Rosenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenthal v. Rosenthal, 464 So. 2d 594, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 459, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12497 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The findings and recommendations of the master dated March 24, 1983 were not clearly erroneous, nor does it appear that the master misconceived the legal effect of the evidence. Consequently, it was error for the trial court to fail to approve and adopt those recommendations. Frank v. Frank, 75 So.2d 282 (Fla.1954); Claughton v. Claughton, 347 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Finding all other points raised on the appeal and cross-appeal to be without merit, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court adopt the master’s March 24, 1983 recommendations in their entirety.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richmond v. State Title & Guaranty Co.
553 So. 2d 1241 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Alpert v. Alpert
479 So. 2d 875 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Greater Clearwater v. Modern Graphic
464 So. 2d 594 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
464 So. 2d 594, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 459, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-rosenthal-fladistctapp-1985.