Rosenthal v. Rosenthal

374 A.2d 206, 172 Conn. 241, 1977 Conn. LEXIS 888
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 11, 1977
StatusPublished

This text of 374 A.2d 206 (Rosenthal v. Rosenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenthal v. Rosenthal, 374 A.2d 206, 172 Conn. 241, 1977 Conn. LEXIS 888 (Colo. 1977).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant, in an action for dissolution of marriage, filed motions for alimony pendente lite and counsel fees. The court ordered the plaintiff to pay the defendant $75 per week alimony and counsel fees of $500. The plaintiff has appealed.

The plaintiff attacks both the finding and the conclusions of the court. The conclusions based upon subordinate facts supported only by incompetent evidence are stricken. The remaining conclusions are insufficient to support the orders made.

There is error, the orders are set aside and the case remanded with direction to grant a new hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
374 A.2d 206, 172 Conn. 241, 1977 Conn. LEXIS 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-rosenthal-conn-1977.