Rosenthal v. O'Brien
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 11-2210
RICHARD ROSENTHAL,
Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
STEVE O'BRIEN,
Respondent, Appellee.
ERRATA SHEET
The opinion of this Court issued on April 15, 2013 is amended as follows:
Page 8, lines 7-8: "(quotations omitted)" inserted after "(1st Cir. 2009)".
Page 9, line 7: "('procedural" is corrected to "('[P]rocedural".
Page 9, line 10: "(internal quotation marks omitted)" is corrected to "(quotations omitted)".
Page 12, line 12: "a" is deleted from in between "as" and "factual".
Page 12, line 14: "(per curiam)" is corrected to "(per curiam)".
Page 13, line 13: "(internal quotation marks omitted)" is corrected to "(quotations omitted)".
Page 18, line 15: "clients" is corrected to "client". Page 20, line 17: "385 F.2D 4, 7" is corrected to "835 F.2d 6, 7".
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rosenthal v. O'Brien (Rosenthal v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.