Rosenthal v. New York Railways Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenthal v. New York Railways Corp.

253 A.D. 204, 1 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8398

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D. 204 (Rosenthal v. New York Railways Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenthal v. New York Railways Corp., 253 A.D. 204, 1 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial court should not have dismissed the complaint during the presentation of the plaintiff’s case. The plaintiff’s credibility was for the consideration of the jury.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and -, JJ.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The trial court should not have dismissed the complaint during the presentation of the plaintiff’s case. The plaintiff’s credibility was for the consideration of the jury.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and -, JJ.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 204, 1 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-new-york-railways-corp-nyappdiv-1938.