Rosenthal v. Mutual Life Insurance

170 N.E.2d 455, 8 N.Y.2d 1075
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 20, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 170 N.E.2d 455 (Rosenthal v. Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenthal v. Mutual Life Insurance, 170 N.E.2d 455, 8 N.Y.2d 1075 (N.Y. 1960).

Opinion

Order of the Appellate Division reversed and the judgment of Trial Term reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, upon the ground that on this record no issue of fact is presented as to whether the death of the insured was accidental within the meaning of the double indemnity policy provision that such death shall be “ a direct result of bodily injury effected solely through external, violent and accidental means, independently and exclusively of all other causes.” No opinion.

Concur: Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Chief Judge Desmond dissents and votes to affirm upon the two opinions for reversal at the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnes v. American International Life Assurance Co.
681 F. Supp. 2d 513 (S.D. New York, 2010)
Barnes v. AMERICAN INTERN. LIFE ASSUR. CO.
681 F. Supp. 2d 513 (S.D. New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 N.E.2d 455, 8 N.Y.2d 1075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-mutual-life-insurance-ny-1960.