Rosenthal v. Langley

Supreme Court

Rosenthal v. Langley

295 U.S. 720, 55 S. Ct. 916

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 27, 1935

DocketNo. 974

StatusPublished

This text of 295 U.S. 720 (Rosenthal v. Langley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenthal v. Langley, 295 U.S. 720, 55 S. Ct. 916 (1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied. The motion to dismiss the appeal herein is granted and the .appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a) Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied. The motion to dismiss the appeal herein is granted and the .appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a) Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 U.S. 720, 55 S. Ct. 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-langley-scotus-1935.