Rosenthal v. Horlick
This text of 7 A.D.2d 924 (Rosenthal v. Horlick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by the vendee named in a contract for the purchase and sale of real property to recover the down payment made on the signing of the contract, to adjudge that he has a lien upon the real property, and to foreclose said lien, the appeal is from an order, inter alia, denying the vendee’s motion to strike out the answer and for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 A.D.2d 924, 183 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-horlick-nyappdiv-1959.