Rosenthal v. Gruenstein

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenthal v. Gruenstein

121 N.Y.S. 226

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 121 N.Y.S. 226 (Rosenthal v. Gruenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenthal v. Gruenstein, 121 N.Y.S. 226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No appeal lies from a judgment taken by default, and the appeal therefrom must therefore be dismissed. Brown v. Bouse, 43 Misc. Rep. 72, 86 N. Y. Supp. 240.

The record submitted shows that the court below properly exercised its discretion in denying the defendants’ motion to open the default, and the order is therefore affirmed.

Appeal from judgment dismissed, and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

No appeal lies from a judgment taken by default, and the appeal therefrom must therefore be dismissed. Brown v. Bouse, 43 Misc. Rep. 72, 86 N. Y. Supp. 240.

The record submitted shows that the court below properly exercised its discretion in denying the defendants’ motion to open the default, and the order is therefore affirmed.

Appeal from judgment dismissed, and order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 N.Y.S. 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-gruenstein-nyappterm-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack