Rosenthal v. Esquinaldo

443 So. 2d 281, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25251
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 20, 1983
DocketNo. 83-1976
StatusPublished

This text of 443 So. 2d 281 (Rosenthal v. Esquinaldo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenthal v. Esquinaldo, 443 So. 2d 281, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25251 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a holding that (1) there was substantial compliance with section 101.051(3), Florida Statutes (1981), see Boardman v. Esteva, 323 So.2d 259 (Fla.1975), cert. denied mem., 425 U.S. 967, 96 S.Ct. 2162, 48 L.Ed.2d 791 (1976), and (2) the trial court correctly concluded that Robert Sosby was a qualified elector of Monroe County notwithstanding the fact that he had applied for and received Homestead exemption in Dade County, see Herron v. Passailaigue, 92 Fla. 818, 110 So. 539 (1926), we affirm the trial court’s judgment validating the Monroe County Canvassing Board certification declaring Alison Fahrer to be the duly elected Monroe County Commissioner for District Four.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boardman v. Esteva
323 So. 2d 259 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
Herron v. Passailaigue
110 So. 539 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
443 So. 2d 281, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-esquinaldo-fladistctapp-1983.