Rosenthal v. Esquinaldo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rosenthal v. Esquinaldo

443 So. 2d 281, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25251

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 1983·No. No. 83-1976·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a holding that (1) there was substantial compliance with section 101.051(3), Florida Statutes (1981), see Boardman v. Esteva, 323 So.2d 259 (Fla.1975), cert. denied mem., 425 U.S. 967, 96 S.Ct. 2162, 48 L.Ed.2d 791 (1976), and (2) the trial court correctly concluded that Robert Sosby was a qualified elector of Monroe County notwithstanding the fact that he had applied for and received Homestead exemption in Dade County, see Herron v. Passailaigue, 92 Fla. 818, 110 So. 539 (1926), we affirm the trial court’s judgment validating the Monroe County Canvassing Board certification declaring Alison Fahrer to be the duly elected Monroe County Commissioner for District Four.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a holding that (1) there was substantial compliance with section 101.051(3), Florida Statutes (1981), see Boardman v. Esteva, 323 So.2d 259 (Fla.1975), cert. denied mem., 425 U.S. 967, 96 S.Ct. 2162, 48 L.Ed.2d 791 (1976), and (2) the trial court correctly concluded that Robert Sosby was a qualified elector of Monroe County notwithstanding the fact that he had applied for and received Homestead exemption in Dade County, see Herron v. Passailaigue, 92 Fla. 818, 110 So. 539 (1926), we affirm the trial court’s judgment validating the Monroe County Canvassing Board certification declaring Alison Fahrer to be the duly elected Monroe County Commissioner for District Four.

Affirmed.

Rosenthal v. Esquinaldo, 443 So. 2d 281, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25251 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

443 So. 2d 281 (Rosenthal v. Esquinaldo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related