Rosenthal v. Doppelt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Rosenthal v. Doppelt

173 Ill. App. 660, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 471

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 28, 1912

DocketGen. No. 18,973

StatusPublished

This text of 173 Ill. App. 660 (Rosenthal v. Doppelt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenthal v. Doppelt, 173 Ill. App. 660, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 471 (Ill. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendants below, Jacob Doppelt, Mrs. Jacob Doppelt and the Foreman Bros. Banking Company, prayed and were allowed an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Cook county on the filing of a bond in the penal sum of two hundred dollars. The defendant Jacob Doppelt filed a bond, the other defendants not joining therein, and alone comes here on appeal to this the October term of the court. The appellees move to dismiss the appeal.

In The First Congregational Church of Harvard v. Page, 255 Ill. 267, the court holds that where the appeal is joint, all joining therein must sign the appeal bond or on motion the appeal will be dismissed. This authority is controlling. The appeal in the case at bar was joint, and the bond being signed by only one of the appellants, the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendants below, Jacob Doppelt, Mrs. Jacob Doppelt and the Foreman Bros. Banking Company, prayed and were allowed an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Cook county on the filing of a bond in the penal sum of two hundred dollars. The defendant Jacob Doppelt filed a bond, the other defendants not joining therein, and alone comes here on appeal to this the October term of the court. The appellees move to dismiss the appeal.

In The First Congregational Church of Harvard v. Page, 255 Ill. 267, the court holds that where the appeal is joint, all joining therein must sign the appeal bond or on motion the appeal will be dismissed. This authority is controlling. The appeal in the case at bar was joint, and the bond being signed by only one of the appellants, the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 Ill. App. 660, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-doppelt-illappct-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack