Rosenthal v. Dicker
268 A.D. 1007, 52 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4655
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 1944·Published
Opinion
Appeal by defendants from an order denying their motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. (MacKinnon Pen Co. v. Fountain Ink Co., 16 Jones & Sp. 442, appeal dismissed, 93 N. Y. 658; Beal v. Chase, 31 Mich. 490.) Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Aldrich,. JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rosenthal v. Dicker, 268 A.D. 1007, 52 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4655 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).
268 A.D. 1007 (Rosenthal v. Dicker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beal v. Chase
31 Mich. 490 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1875)