Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Rosenthal v. Dicker

Rosenthal v. Dicker

268 A.D. 1007, 52 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4655
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 18, 1944
StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D. 1007 (Rosenthal v. Dicker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenthal v. Dicker, 268 A.D. 1007, 52 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4655 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Opinion

Appeal by defendants from an order denying their motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. (MacKinnon Pen Co. v. Fountain Ink Co., 16 Jones & Sp. 442, appeal dismissed, 93 N. Y. 658; Beal v. Chase, 31 Mich. 490.) Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Aldrich,. JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beal v. Chase
31 Mich. 490 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D. 1007, 52 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-dicker-nyappdiv-1944.