Rosenthal v. Board of Trustees

252 A.D.2d 388, 675 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8123
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 9, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 252 A.D.2d 388 (Rosenthal v. Board of Trustees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenthal v. Board of Trustees, 252 A.D.2d 388, 675 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered October 31, 1995, directing respondents to conduct an administrative hearing concerning the cause of petitioner’s disability, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the petition dismissed.

While on duty, petitioner, an Assistant Chief in the Police Department, entered the Municipal Building with another officer, and tripped on a step in front of the revolving door, injuring himself. The lights over the revolving door were not working and the passage to the door was partially obstructed by bottled water and construction material. The respondent Board of Trustees found that petitioner had not sustained an “accident” and retired him on ordinary disability. The IAS Court directed respondent to hold a hearing as to the cause of petitioner’s disability.

The Court of Appeals has defined “accident”, as used in Administrative Code of the City of New York § 13-252, by adopting the definition of a: “ ‘sudden, fortuitous mischance, [389]*389unexpected, out, of the ordinary, and injurious in impact’ (Johnson Corp. v Indemnity Ins. Co. of North Amer., 6 AD2d 97, 100, affd 7 NY2d 222).” (Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees, 57 NY2d 1010, 1012.)

The Court of Appeals has recently held that a police officer’s falling down stairs as a result of his own misstep was “not so out-of-the-ordinary or unexpected as to constitute an accidental injury as a matter of law” (Matter of Starnella v Bratton, 92 NY2d 836, 839). The instant matter would appear to fall within the parameters of the Starnella decision and must therefore be reversed. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Torres v. Kelly
102 A.D.3d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Hopp v. Kelly
4 A.D.3d 176 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Mejia v. Kerik
301 A.D.2d 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Russell v. Board of Trustees of New York City Police Pension Fund
288 A.D.2d 19 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Hess v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund of the Police Department
255 A.D.2d 163 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 A.D.2d 388, 675 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenthal-v-board-of-trustees-nyappdiv-1998.