Rosenthal, Feder, & Co. v. Levy

California Supreme Court

Rosenthal, Feder, & Co. v. Levy

14 P. 368, 73 Cal. 9, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 591

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJune 29, 1887

DocketNo. 12016

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 14 P. 368 (Rosenthal, Feder, & Co. v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenthal, Feder, & Co. v. Levy, 14 P. 368, 73 Cal. 9, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 591 (Cal. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Temple, J.

The order appealed from in this case is in no sense a final order, and is not appealable. Furthermore, it is one the court should have made of its own motion, upon mere suggestion. The assignee was, apparently, in default, as he had not complied with section 29 of the Insolvent Act, which required him to render an account at the expiration of three months.

The assignee cannot at any time be heard to object to an order requiring him to render an account. The court may so order as often as occasion seems to require.

Appeal dismissed.

Patebson, J., and McKjnstey, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI