Rosenstein v. United States

193 F. 1022, 113 C.C.A. 668, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1122
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 2, 1912
DocketNo. 1,783
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 F. 1022 (Rosenstein v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenstein v. United States, 193 F. 1022, 113 C.C.A. 668, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1122 (7th Cir. 1912).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find in the record no error of such substance as to require or justify an order for a new trial. Counsel for plaintiff in error,, however, have called our attention to the matter of a proposed showing that the punishment should be less in view of extenuating circumstances which plaintiff in error excusably failed to bring before the District Court. As we have no jurisdiction to adjust the sentence, and as it seems proper that the matter should be inquired into, the judgment is vacated and the cause remanded for a resentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Insurance Union v. Buckley
12 Ohio Law. Abs. 152 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 F. 1022, 113 C.C.A. 668, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenstein-v-united-states-ca7-1912.