Rosenstein v. United States
This text of 193 F. 1022 (Rosenstein v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find in the record no error of such substance as to require or justify an order for a new trial. Counsel for plaintiff in error,, however, have called our attention to the matter of a proposed showing that the punishment should be less in view of extenuating circumstances which plaintiff in error excusably failed to bring before the District Court. As we have no jurisdiction to adjust the sentence, and as it seems proper that the matter should be inquired into, the judgment is vacated and the cause remanded for a resentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 F. 1022, 113 C.C.A. 668, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenstein-v-united-states-ca7-1912.