Rosenstein v. Traders' Insurance Co. of Chicago, Illinois
This text of 112 A.D. 902 (Rosenstein v. Traders' Insurance Co. of Chicago, Illinois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on prevailing opinion in Rosenstein v. Traders’ Ins. Co. (79 App. Div. 481); and opinion in Rosenstein v. Traders’ Insurance Co. (102 App. Div. 147.) All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented on grounds, stated in dissenting .opinion in Rosenstein v. Traders’ Insurance Co. (79 App. Div. 481, 487); Kruse, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 A.D. 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenstein-v-traders-insurance-co-of-chicago-illinois-nyappdiv-1906.