Rosenstein v. Traders' Ins. Co. of Chicago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenstein v. Traders' Ins. Co. of Chicago

82 N.Y.S. 1113

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 82 N.Y.S. 1113 (Rosenstein v. Traders' Ins. Co. of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenstein v. Traders' Ins. Co. of Chicago, 82 N.Y.S. 1113 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion granted by amending decision by striking out the words, “upon questions of law only, the facts having been examined, and no error found therein,” and inserting in place thereof the words “upon questions of law and fact.” Said motion is so granted upon the condition that the plaintiffs have the right, if they so elect, to discontinue, without costs, any appeal instituted to review said decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Motion granted by amending decision by striking out the words, “upon questions of law only, the facts having been examined, and no error found therein,” and inserting in place thereof the words “upon questions of law and fact.” Said motion is so granted upon the condition that the plaintiffs have the right, if they so elect, to discontinue, without costs, any appeal instituted to review said decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 N.Y.S. 1113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenstein-v-traders-ins-co-of-chicago-nyappdiv-1903.