Rosenstein v. Rothenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenstein v. Rothenberg

8 A.D.2d 722, 187 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8456

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 722 (Rosenstein v. Rothenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenstein v. Rothenberg, 8 A.D.2d 722, 187 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on a type-written record on appeal and on typewritten appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten record on appeal and one copy of the typewritten appellant’s points upon the attorney for the defendant and files six copies of each thereof with this court on or before September 24, 1959, with notice of argument for October 6, 1959, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. The cross motion to dismiss the appeal is granted unless the appellant perfects his appeal for argument on October 6, 1959. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on a type-written record on appeal and on typewritten appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten record on appeal and one copy of the typewritten appellant’s points upon the attorney for the defendant and files six copies of each thereof with this court on or before September 24, 1959, with notice of argument for October 6, 1959, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. The cross motion to dismiss the appeal is granted unless the appellant perfects his appeal for argument on October 6, 1959. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 722, 187 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenstein-v-rothenberg-nyappdiv-1959.